Jeremy Bentham on Punishment: an Evaluation

This study critically evaluates Jeremy Bentham's utilitarian approach to punishment, motivated by three poignant cases of injustice that highlight systemic flaws in the criminal justice system. The research delves into the moral and legal philosophies surrounding punishment, examining its effectiveness in reducing recidivism and delivering justice to victims and society. By scrutinizing the complexities of punitive measures, the study aims to uncover the underlying issues that often lead to the inadequacy of current practices. This study employs an analytical, historical, and critical methodologies to assesse Bentham's theory and it's implications for contemporary justice systems. It explores how Bentham's utilitarian framework, which emphasizes the 'greatest happiness principle', can provide insights into the rationale behind punishment and its intended effects on both offenders and society at large. However, the study also argues that while Bentham's ideas offer a valuable foundation for understanding punishment, they reveal notable limitations that necessitate the exploration of alternative approaches, such as restorative justice and rehabilitative paradigms. The significance of this study lies not only in its academic contribution to the discourse on punishment but also in its practical implications for policymakers and legal practitioners. By engaging with contemporary issues related to justice and punishment, the study aspires to inform and influence reforms aimed at creating more effective, humane, and equitable justice systems. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of addressing social inequalities and biases inherent in punitive practices. Ultimately, this research seeks to contribute meaningfully to ongoing debates regarding the legal, ethical, and practical aspects of punishment, offering insights that can guide efforts to improve justice systems worldwide and promote a more just society.